One interesting thing about the TV show is that I could not tell if he was performing in front of a live audience or if they were playing a laugh track on the TV. It seemed like there was an audience because he would pause to let them laugh where he expected them to laugh. He also made an unintentional mistaking, saying “beauty pageant explode children” and then corrected his statement to “exploit children.” The audience laughed at this error. Presumably, everyone in a live audience who came to see the show would know of the show and would want to be there. I thought things might have been a little different at ND. I heard quite a few people on the quad say that they did not know who the comedian was but decided to come anyway. I thought this made it more challenging for the comedian because he wasn’t necessarily playing to a fan-based audience as he normally is in the studio. There also seemed to be times when he mis-judged the audience. Some of his crude or political jokes were not well received by a majority of the audience. When this happened, he made a joke about himself or the audience such as “Okay, no more killing-baby-seals jokes, but lighten up, people.” He laughed off his own mistakes in humor and continued with the show.
Excuses, excuses: why I dread writing
17 years ago
2 comments:
very intriguing observations em! thanks for highlighting how important the audience and the audience's expectations are. the comedians on the show i watched are paid to come out and perform their skits, probably after being screened by what i call "comedy judges." i guess that the audience that pays tickets to see the show are not expecting a particular type of genre of jokes, but are open to various differences in humor because of the wide variety of comedians that do come on the show. although, it could be true that before people buy the ticket, they know who is going to be on the show and then buy the tickets.
also, your insight in how the comedian tailors its act to each particular audience is outstanding. it is likely that the comedians i watched have only one act that they show to any audience, regardless of who is in it. mchale seems to be more of a improv stand-up comic in the sense that he works with the crowd and changes his act depending on their reactions, however, he still has structure to follow. anyways, you offer an excellent perspective in examining humor, at least thats what the inebriated anthropologist says.
First of all, he was hilarious when he came here to ND, much funnier than on the show. But really, how funny do you have to be when you are showing clips of people doing ridiculous things in the first place. Audience is crucial to humor, and I'm pretty sure any comedian would tell you that you can plan and plan but until you go in front of a live crowd you will never know how funny you are. You sort of test the water with certain jokes and then build off of what worked at first. It is interesting as an anthropologist to watch comedians, especially on campus, because (if they are good) the jokes they tell by the end of the set can show a great deal about the community and their sense of humor. Apparently after McHales' show him and I learned something together: that Notre Dame students really like their vampire jokes.
(I guess that last line would be an inside joke)
Post a Comment